Dear Michael, Recently I read an article where you stated that you could no longer believe that God is directly responsible for the creation of the universe. I will have to admit that I read this from a facebook post which quoted a Christian news site. Having been burnt by this kind of “gotcha-journalism” before, I knew I needed to read your original blog from which this article quoted. Based on reading this entire post, I would like to respond to your blog entitled, “What Do We Believe?” Your article deeply concerns me – not just because of your lack of belief in the Creator and His revelation to us of how He created the heavens and the earth. My concern goes deeper than that. My greatest concern is on the way you cleverly dismiss the Bible as an authority because it is about belief, and yet tout yourself and modern-day science as a fitting replacement, Your arguments in this blog post take on the appearance of wisdom and ‘well thought out’ reasonings. The problem one finds while reading them is that, in the end, they are based on little more than a false premise that you are a free thinker without an ultimate authority. Your reason alone (informed by scientists who are smart enough to reject biblical creation and hold fast to evolutionary theory) leads you to your premises unlike those who hold the Bible as an authoritative book in all matters of faith and practice. You make an interesting statement early in your article. You state, “. . . pretty much everything is a belief because everything we know is built upon assumptions.” After this seemingly wise statement you speak of what happens when “some of what you built the words and concepts on – no longer exists.” From this dubious vantage point you begin to speak of God, the Bible, the book of Genesis – and eventually even whether what we believe about God is even important. What is fascinating is that you then use “your own words” to convince us not to judge or make distinctions based on what we may or may not believe to be God’s words (i.e. the Bible itself). Even though you seek to present some self-deprecating views of yourself, you do little more than replace one authority with another. What is truly fascinating when I read this article is that in the end – I become the authority over myself – just as you become the ultimate authority over yourself. You and I define our own words. You and I also choose to decide if our former definition of words were true – or were imposed upon us by others (in your case those who taught you the Bible in Christian school and church). You approach biblical authority with the greatest of skepticism while embracing current scientific theory as factual. What you have done in your really cool and open minded article is trade one form of authority for a different one. Whereas people like myself who CAN believe in a God-created universe – Adam and Eve – a 6000 year old earth – a literal world-wide flood – and personally my favorite, “naked people in a garden eating an apple being responsible for the death of the dinosaurs.” (Isn’t it interesting when you want to prove other people to be stupid – you not only denigrate their beliefs – you mock them by mis-stating them.) While we are held up to a very high-minded form of ridicule (notice the NOTE below), your particular views are help up as enlightened, gracious, and far more believable. We are seen as those who hold fast to defined words – while you are seen as one who is more interested in how someone lives. Your “healthy beliefs” are then given credit for leading to a “lifestyle” defined by caring attitudes about your neighbor, ministering and caring for the poor, and living according to James chapter 2 (which evidently IS God’s Word?). We are left thinking that we should reject the Bible as a literal authority (quite an authoritative thought, don’t you think) and be more loving and kind (at least how you define loving and kind – which considering the neighbor and poor stuff is hard to argue with – you know). What we actually get is a view where WE become our own authority – at least the “we” that agrees with modern scientific theory. I don’t hate you Michael – and neither do I know whether you are lost or saved at this point. All I’ve done is read your article – and yet that article concerns me greatly. It does because it presents the same lie that caused our world to end up in the mess it is in today. “Has God said?” is the lie to which I refer. The original lie was to distrust God’s Word – and instead decide that WE would make a much better god over ourselves. Isn’t that what Satan said to Eve? “God knows that in the day that you eat it – you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” How we live (which seems to be your way of determining what is best) is derived from what we believe to be truth. If truth then is solely in the eye of the beholder – because us-forbid we’d actually believe God’s revelation of Himself in the Bible – then isn’t it true that the beholder becomes God in the end? That is little more than a 6000 year old lie repackaged in really cool blog post. [NOTE: Yes, Adam and Eve were naked. No, they did not eat an apple – the Bible simply states it was fruit. Yes, the Fall of man into sin precipitated death in our world. No, the dinosaurs were not singled out in this judgment upon sin – and its effects on the earth. BUT . . . when lacing these facts and mental inventions together it does make the Bible accounts sound sufficiently stupid doesn’t it? How you state something truly does have an effect on how believable someone else views it. Imagine if I referred to evolutionary theory in a similar way. It is little more than believing that, “Everything came about as a result of nothing being done by no one for absolutely no reason at all.”]
0 Comments
In just a few weeks a movie is going to be released called, “Rise of the Planet of the Apes.” This prequel is supposed to be an explanation of why apes began to have human tendencies – and then supposedly evolved to have human intelligence. It also recounts to us the process whereby the apes took over earth and began to do a biological cleansing – reducing humans to the positions formerly held by the apes within the animal kingdom. Heavily influencing the movie is the idea of evolution itself with its view that animals and plants can cross the species barrier by experiencing macro-evolution.
Due to research at three different laboratories in the United Kingdom (King’s College London, Newcastle University and Warwick University) there is now concern that a scenario like that presented in this upcoming movie might be possible. Scientists at these three labs have created more than 150 of what they are calling, “human-animal hybrid” embryos. These experimental hybrid embryos were produced in secret research over about three years. The reason for the hybrid experimentation was to find cures in them for a wide range of diseases that affect mankind presently. One commentator on this so-called medical research accused the scientists of “dabbling in the grotesque.” Three basic types of hybrids are being made in these laboratories. The first is an animal egg which is fertilized by human sperm. The second is called a “cybrid” which is a human nucleus that is implanted into an animal cell. The third is called a “chimera” which is a mixture of human cells put into animal embryos. It should be noted that no cure for any disease has come from these experiments. In fact, something that is not often stated in the media is that NO CURE for any disease has come from any testing on embryos or any harvesting of embryonic stem cells. Yet this is what is held out for us as the source of future miracle cures for diseases. It is a type of scientific blackmail that promises cures that have not materialized so that ethical and moral lines may be crossed. Scientific fact is that of the nearly 80 cures that have come from stem cell research and testing, ALL have come from ADULT STEM CELLS. None have ever come from any embryonic research – whether from pure human research of from this more grotesque mixing of species. Those who have warned about a “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” scenario are calling for much stricter rules and laws against having laboratory animals injected in ways that would seek to give them human attributes. One such rule would prohibit having human stem cells injected into the brains of . . . you guessed it, apes. The lead author of the Medical Research Council’s National Institute for Medical Research, Professor Robin Lovell-Badge, sees no need for such rules or laws – stating that the existing laws in the United Kingdom state that these embryos have to be destroyed within 14 days. I don’t know about anyone else – but the simple fact that these scientists have sought to keep their research secret – along with a fair knowledge of mankind’s ability to deceive and manipulate circumstances – makes me less than impressed with the safety and the ethics that they promise to maintain. But this brings up a larger question for those of us who study biblical prophecy. Is there any biblical reference to a hybrid human being or animal? Some might refer to the strange creatures that are mentioned in the book of Revelation – and question whether these could be the end of this grotesque mixing of species? Let’s take a look at this possibility by looking at the Scriptures. Some wonder about this passage in Revelation 6, “I looked, and behold, an ashen horse; and he who sat on it had the name Death; and Hades was following with him. Authority was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword and with famine and with pestilence and by the wild beasts of the earth.” (Revelation 6:8, NASB) They wonder if the “wild beasts of the earth” could refer to a hybrid animal? The Greek word used here for “wild beasts” is “therion.” Throughout Scripture this word is used to refer to a venomous creature like a snake of some kind. It is also used to refer to various other animals in the animal kingdom. It is also the word used here, in Revelation 9, and in Revelation 13 of strange looking beasts. The problem with calling these beasts hybrids is that the language that is used here is descriptive language – rather than a more literal statement. Here in this first passage in Revelation the wild beasts mentioned here are most likely just that – wild beasts. This means most likely that undomesticated animals would lose their fear of man – and begin killing men at a rate never before seen on earth. A second passage some might consider to be indicative of hybrid experiments is the two types of beasts mentioned in Revelation chapter 9. In Revelation 9:7-11 we have a being that has the “appearance” of locusts. But as these strange beings come up out of the earth – they are described in the following way. “The appearance of the locusts was like horses prepared for battle; and on their heads appeared to be crowns like gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. They had hair like the hair of women, and their teeth were like the teeth of lions. They had breastplates like breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots, of many horses rushing to battle. They have tails like scorpions, and stings; and in their tails is their power to hurt men for five months. They have as king over them, the angel of the abyss; his name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in the Greek he has the name Apollyon.” Some would point to the fact that these weird looking “locust-like” creatures have faces, “like the faces of men.” They also have hair, “like the hair of women.” Yet in spite of these things – they also are described with aspects of lions, scorpions, and horses. Is this the result of embryonic research gone horribly wrong? Again, the language in this passage is that of description – not literal statements. Terms used here that clue us into this are the word, “like,” and the phrase “the appearance of.” Another clue to us that this is a more spiritual description than a literal human/animal hybrid is the fact that these beings come out of “the bottomless pit” and are eventually identified as having the “angel of the abyss” king over them. After this is stated, this king is further identified with names that are normally given to Satan – or which refer to him. Thus these are most likely not the result of human embryonic engineering gone bad – but are demonic beings instead. Later in Revelation chapter 9 we read of horses that have the heads of lions and tails which have multi-headed serpents on them. This description though also includes a statement that their mouths have fire, smoke, and brimstone coming from them. Thus if this is some kind of sickening hybrid – it has attributes which no other animal on earth currently has. This more than likely is a first century description of some kind of machine used – which has the ability to shoot fire from it. Once again this is a “vision” as well as the word “like” used in it. The final two beasts that might be some kind of human/animal hybrid are those described for us in Revelation 13. If these are hybrids – they are definitely hybrids of multiple animals. Yet the language used here is very reminiscent of that used in Daniel. The beasts described there represented kingdoms – and how those kingdoms acted when they ruled on earth. These two beasts seem to be a combination of all these beings – with their worst attributes being put forward. Thus we have here the representatives of Satan during the tribulation period – described in how they act and what kind of “rule” they exert on earth. Although tantalizing to our imaginations, the idea of a “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” scenario is very, unlikely. It may make for great movie-making, but it would involve poor biblical exegesis at best. What we do have here though is an eventuality of the lie of evolution manifesting itself in the most grotesque of ways. The lie of evolution is that we can cross the barriers of species – and have some kind of hybrid that brings us something far better than God’s original creation. This involves man being smarter than God, who created this world with species barriers irrevocably in place. Mankind, though, in its rebellion against God continues to dabble in the grotesque, hoping to make a hybrid man/animal that can once and for all disprove that a Creator God has ever existed. Good luck professors . . . because your work, which may create a kind of sick curiosity in mankind at first, will never manifest itself in anything truly helpful to mankind. And for those of you who fear that one day apes may rise and take over the earth – subjugating man to a mere animal role – you should read your Bible with greater care. Man will continue to be the supreme manifestation of God’s creation. Yet while man will never be removed from the position of the most glorious of His creatures, the fact will still remain that something is seriously wrong with mankind. He was made to directly reflect the glory of God in a way no animal can – yet he continues to sin and live as a rebel to God’s ultimate purposes. Maybe a better title for a movie would be, “Rise of the Planet of the Fools,” which would chronicle for us the horror of a creature made to fellowship with God – who rejects Him and instead worships himself. Then again maybe our theaters are not quite ready for the scariest movie of all. |
What is the Prophecy/News Update?At Calvary Chapel of Jonesboro, we believe that history is moving toward fulfilling God's plans and purposes. In an effort to help us be prepared for His appearing - and also to chronicle news items you just won't see in the national media - this page is devoted to sharing those items and their possible significance to Thank you for visiting our website! Everything on this site is offered for free. If, however, you would like to make a donation to help pay for its continued presence on the internet, you can do that by clicking here. The only thing we ask is that you give first to the local church you attend.
Thank you! Archives
July 2020
Categories
All
|